Fusing ICU Time Series with TabPFN-Based Clinical Context

Co-Supervised by: Nico Bigler

If you are interested in this topic or have further questions, do not hesitate to contact daniel.bigler@students.unibe.ch.

Background / Context

ICU risk prediction can combine evolving physiology with tabular clinical context. This project investigates whether a TabPFN-derived representation adds predictive value beyond a conventional context branch. HiRID contains more than 33,000 ICU admissions and longitudinal physiological, laboratory and treatment data. Its static context is limited: age and sex can be supplemented with explicitly defined early measurements, but a comprehensive comorbidity profile should not be assumed. The project builds on the HiRID-ICU-Benchmark and requires credentialed PhysioNet access.

Research Question(s) / Goals

The research aims to evaluate the incremental value of TabPFN-based context by:

  • Comparing temporal-only, tabular-only and combined prediction models
  • Testing whether TabPFN improves fusion relative to an MLP context branch
  • Examining the value of temporal history while keeping the prediction landmark fixed
  • Evaluating discrimination, calibration and computational feasibility

Approach / Methods

The student will:

  • Use HiRID v1.1.1 and a pinned benchmark pipeline; audit eligible admissions, events, missingness and compute requirements before modelling
  • Initially predict circulatory failure in the next 12 hours at a 6-hour ICU landmark, excluding current failure and applying explicit rules for incomplete outcome observation
  • Combine age, sex and selected first-2-hour laboratory/treatment summaries with an LSTM physiological branch; exclude APACHE group unless its timely availability is established
  • Compare logistic regression, LightGBM and TabPFN baselines with LSTM-only, LSTM + MLP and LSTM + TabPFN; include LightGBM on temporal summaries
  • Generate local TabPFN training embeddings out of fold and restrict context to training data; keep all observations from each admission together and prevent future-information leakage
  • Evaluate AUPRC, AUROC, Brier score and calibration with admission-level uncertainty estimates; document that repeated stays of one person cannot be linked in HiRID
  • Use out-of-fold probability fusion as a stated alternative if embedding extraction exceeds the available compute budget

Expected Contributions / Outcomes

  • A reproducible comparison of tabular foundation-model representations and conventional clinical-context branches
  • Evidence on whether fusion adds useful information, including a valid negative result
  • A documented cohort, leakage controls and an analysis of performance versus computational cost

Required Skills / Prerequisites

  • Python and machine learning; PyTorch and basic sequence modelling for the full Master project
  • Interest in clinical time series and careful evaluation; clinical supervision for label review
  • For a Bachelor thesis, a prepared authorized landmark dataset and a reduced comparison of tabular models; neural fusion is outside the core scope

Possible Extensions

  • A Transformer temporal encoder or an additional prediction landmark
  • Respiratory-failure prediction after completing the circulatory task
  • External validation after confirming compatible variables and outcome definitions

Further Reading / Starting Literature

  • Yèche, H., et al. (2021). “HiRID-ICU-Benchmark — A Comprehensive Machine Learning Benchmark on High-resolution ICU Data.” NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks. Link
  • Hollmann, N., et al. (2025). “Accurate predictions on small data with a tabular foundation model.” Nature, 637, 319–326. Link
  • HiRID documentation: data structure and schemas. Link
  • Prior Labs. TabPFN embedding documentation: out-of-fold extraction and local execution. Link