Dynamic Prediction of Postoperative Hospital Outcomes
Co-Supervised by: Nico Bigler
If you are interested in this topic or have further questions, do not hesitate to contact daniel.bigler@students.unibe.ch.
Background / Context
Postoperative organ dysfunction and physiological changes may alter a patient’s subsequent hospital course. This project investigates whether longitudinal perioperative information improves dynamic prediction of live hospital discharge and in-hospital death beyond current clinical status and conventional summary features. INSPIRE contains approximately 130,000 operations with longitudinal laboratory measurements, perioperative vital signs and hospital outcomes. Published measurements are partly aggregated and quantized, so data availability and outcome definitions require validation. Access requires PhysioNet credentialing and the dataset agreement.
Research Question(s) / Goals
The research aims to evaluate dynamic postoperative prediction by:
- Comparing current-state and summary-feature baselines with a sequential deep-learning model
- Testing whether longitudinal history improves prediction of live hospital discharge and death
- Investigating the additional value of renal-dysfunction information
- Evaluating discrimination, calibration and robustness across prediction horizons
Approach / Methods
The student will:
- Use INSPIRE v1.4.2 and independently audit eligible operations, longitudinal measurements, hospital outcome times and missingness
- Define a postoperative cohort and a clinically reviewed creatinine-based renal-dysfunction representation
- Initially predict at a fixed postoperative landmark, with a proposed seven-day horizon, among patients still hospitalized
- Use only information available by the prediction time and explicitly handle incomplete follow-up
- Compare logistic regression/LightGBM and a classical landmark or competing-risk survival baseline with one LSTM/GRU-based dynamic survival model
- Evaluate AUPRC, AUROC, Brier score and calibration; use appropriate competing-risk evaluation for discharge and death
- Assess whether temporal modelling adds value beyond current organ state and conventional summaries
- Keep all records from the same subject within one data split and prevent future-information leakage
Expected Contributions / Outcomes
- A reproducible dynamic prediction pipeline for postoperative hospital outcomes
- A fair comparison of conventional and deep-learning-based approaches
- Evidence on whether longitudinal information improves prediction, including a valid negative result
- A documented assessment of missingness, outcome definitions and computational feasibility
Required Skills / Prerequisites
- Python and machine learning; PyTorch and basic sequence modelling for the full Master project
- Interest in clinical time series and survival analysis
- Clinical supervision for outcome and phenotype definitions
- For a Bachelor thesis, prepared authorized data and a reduced comparison of fixed-landmark prediction models
Possible Extensions
- Additional postoperative landmarks or prediction horizons
- Prediction of renal-dysfunction progression
- Addition of a second organ system after validating its measurements
- External validation in a compatible perioperative dataset
- Transfer to a larger institutional perioperative dataset with more detailed longitudinal measurements
Further Reading / Starting Literature
- Lim, L., et al. (2024). “INSPIRE, a publicly available research dataset for perioperative medicine.” Scientific Data, 11, 655. Link
- Lim, L., & Lee, H. (2026). INSPIRE, version 1.4.2. PhysioNet. Link
- Lee, C., Yoon, J., & van der Schaar, M. (2020). “Dynamic-DeepHit: A Deep Learning Approach for Dynamic Survival Analysis With Competing Risks Based on Longitudinal Data.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 67(1), 122–133. Link
- Kork, F., et al. (2025). “Impact of perioperative organ injury on morbidity and mortality in 28 million surgical patients.” Nature Communications, 16, 3366. Link
